THE ZEN OF MIXING IN 5.1

By Jeff MacKay

Professional Sound Cover Richard Chycki originally got his start in the audio industry not behind the console, but holding a guitar. He first started recording his own demos in what he calls a “frighteningly scary” 16-track facility connected to a rehearsal space where he used to jam in his youth. “Eventually I started recording demos for other artists, demos which made their way to record companies. Labels started calling me with gigs,” recalls Chycki. His recording work eventually took over his guitar playing aspirations as he found a creative release in recording and mixing music. Although initially focused on working with Canadian artists, he made the requisite move to America for a few years where he worked with artists like Aerosmith, Mick Jagger, Shawn Colvin, Pink, Seal, Def Leppard and Jonny Lang to name a few. He’s recently been able to bring some of that work back to Canada, while also continuing to support his native country’s music industry. “I’ve always had strong roots in Canada and enjoy supporting Canadian facilities and talent so it’s great to bring the work north. Artists like Shania Twain, Celine Dion, Avril Lavigne, Nickelback, Our Lady Peace, Tom Cochrane (and a wealth of others that I apologize for not mentioning) as well as production folks like the late Bruce Fairbairn, Bob Rock, GGGarth Richardson, Daniel Lanois, David Foster and engineers like Randy Staub, Mike Fraser and others have provided us with a very valuable calling card. Through their tenacity, creativity and sheer numbers in sales, they have shown that Canadians have the ability to compete, thrive, and dominate any music market in the world.”

At the time of the following interview, Chycki was currently in the studio mixing 5.1 surround product for Canadian bands Our Lady Peace and A Simple Plan as well as mixes for the movie soundtrack to The Real Cancun. He was also mixing tracks with producer Iestyn Polson (David Gray) for a new David usher release.



He was hard at work at Metalworks Studios’ Studio 6 where he was mixing on one of the two SSL 9000 consoles in Canada. “Gil Moore (the studio’s owner) has been exceptionally attentive to the ongoing developments in DVD technology and has honed the surround capabilities of that room to a pretty fine edge,” shares Chycki, who took time out from his busy mix schedule to spend some time discussing his own personal Zen of mixing in 5.1 surround…

.What’s the single most important thing to keep in mind when mixing 5.1 compared to stereo?

The main commonality between stereo and 5.1 mixing is that they are both sonic environments and maintaining an environment is key. Given the additional placement and movement possibilities in surround, I often resist the temptation to have everything moving around me; I’m not a big fan of things consistently spinning around me in surround. It’s too distracting and often pulls from the song … I’ll do motion features but overall I find maximizing the sensation of total envelopment rather than relying on ‘tricks’ is the secret to a timeless surround mix as the format matures.

Does mixing in 5.1 give you the opportunity to bring certain elements in the mix to life that could be lost in stereo?

Working the subwoofer à la Jurassic Park’s T-Rex stomping goes a long way for adding impact to pyro and chest pounding kick drums for live material. The ability to adjust placement 360 degrees laterally via panning or phase allows for an extreme sense of being sonically encapsulated that is not possible to achieve in a conventional stereo listening situation. Tastefully done, surround can make for a very real audio environment. Coupled with some great visual work, it makes for an awesome multimedia experience.

One of the not-so-great elements that can be brought to life is recording artifacts. Because things can be spread out so much more in surround, sometimes things like recording punches or noise/distortion that were masked in a stereo mix can become exposed in a surround mix.

Let’s talk about some of the surround voodoo, that is to say, bass management and the centre speaker.

I’ve written some cool settings and routings in the TC 6000 to work through bass management. For me, the use of the centre speaker varies according to the source material. For live material, I tend to go pretty light on the centre speaker; I’ll usually put a small amount of a few mono elements in the centre but nothing with a lot of bottom end that will pull at the mix. I use the centre quite a bit more for studio DVDs but as in stereo mixing, a surround mix has to be tested on a number of systems to achieve the best mix and to make sure that the mix doesn’t fall apart easily on different playback systems.




It sounds like you prefer to mix 5.1 in a discrete fashion. Do you use any simulation techniques to turn stereo into 5.1 mixes?


My preference is to give the attention the artist deserves to create a proper 5.1 mix to accompany the stereo mix. I’ve heard a number of faux 5.1 techniques. Some are better than others and I understand that because of circumstances or economics, they can be a necessary evil at times. Ethically, it should be brought to the artist’s or client’s attention that overall they are an integrity compromise at the expense of the final product quality. I’ve played faux 5.1 and real 5.1 products for clients and once they’re side by side, there is no quality comparison. Doing a discrete mix gives a much superior result and longevity; it’s more likely that the masters won’t have to be handled again to improve the ‘faking’ technique if the mix is done using discrete methods in the first place.

Gear-wise, what’s your preference to use for 5.1 mixing? Speakers? Software? Console? Outboard gear? What equipment can you NOT live without?

My speakers of choice are KRK E8s. I use Pro Tools HD for editing and the individual tracks are spread across an SSL 9080J console. The Lexicon 960 and TC 6000 are both indispensable to mixing in a surround environment and I’ve been recently looking at an (Eventide) Orville. I also use an old modified Quantec QRS that has fantastic multi-channel imaging.

Do you use a surround master deck?

I generally print back to hard-disk for masters via Prism Dream converters, but I’ve been known to print to 8-track analog on occasion.

How do you tackle fold down mixes?

I always provide two sets of data streams – stereo and 5.1.

Are you finding more instruments coming to you recorded specifically for surround?

Absolutely. That’s most notable in orchestra sessions. I’ll often get a Decca tree and rear ambience included in the regular complement. When I’ve been recording, I’ve been tracking drums in a surround compatible fashion for quite some time too.

How has the industry accepted the 5.1 format? What do you think the future will bring for 5.1 audio? How important will it become?

The music portion of the DVD industry is very fresh so it’s an exciting time for DVD. It’s impressive to see labels having foresight and taking the initiative to proliferate the medium. With so much multimedia versatility available with the DVD format it’s no wonder DVD is experiencing a phenomenal growth. Once car audio is surround-standard and radio stations complete the retrofit to broadcast in 5.1, DVD will quickly become the de facto standard.

The multimedia aspect of DVD gives a stronger bang-for-the buck over the venerable CD. More entertainment, more creativity … more for consumers. In this day of free downloads, DVDs represent a strong inducement to return to the stores and purchase entertainment product. The fact that DVD is the only growing sector of the industry is indicative that the buying public is responding to these benefits.


The current Our Lady Peace project you’re working on, is it for a live album and DVD?

I have mixed enough material for a double CD and a two-hour DVD. I believe there are plans for a television show as well, hopefully to be broadcast in surround.

How did you hook up with Our Lady Peace?

I had a previous working relationship with the band a few years back and have worked a lot for Sony Music in America. I had been talking with Raine Maida at the end of last year about doing some work together in Los Angeles. The band heard some live mixes I had done for Aerosmith as well as the compilation of surround mixes for Tom Cochrane, so working on a DVD was a pretty natural progression for us.

What format were you given to work with?


The shows were recorded using either RADAR or Tascam decks at the venue. I’ve been mixing from Pro Tools for years regardless of whether it’s a surround or stereo mix session so it’s standard practice that I request incoming material in Pro Tools format or I have my assistant transfer the incoming media to Pro Tools HD. I’ll go 96 kHZ/24-bit whenever it’s practical.

How did the band record the show each night? Was it recorded every night or only a few for this sole purpose?

A remote truck recorded the main components of the show over two nights in Edmonton and Calgary with the double CD and DVD in mind. I also looked at performances from Montreal, Ottawa and Vancouver and used a few pieces from each of those shows. But for the most part, the Edmonton show prevailed as the root performance.

What input did the band offer? How involved were they in the process?

The band came to the table with some pretty hot live performances. Logistics dictated that I mixed the CD material first and I had to mix while the band was touring in Europe. This is such a sign of the times: OLP, the label and management previewed the mixes for the most part by downloading mixes posted on my secure server. Raine and the rest of the band were very helpful in offering first hand information from the recorded shows which went a long way to organize the sheer volume of audio files. All of the guys in the band are so creative; it was a pleasure to take their views and

incorporate them into the show. Generally I would interpret the mix for the song and the mixes were recalled and changes incorporated … pretty standard stuff except that it was all done via the Internet. Mixes were reposted and previewed by the band and approved from half way around the world. The surround mixes essentially maintain the balances and tones from the CD mixes with the spatial changes adapted for the format.

- PS - Jeff Mackay is the Editor of Professional Sound

WHY DVD?
By Richard Chycki

The most pervasive versatile medium for the movie, music and computer industries are taking the world by storm. As a mixer, I’ve noticed a profound increase in music industry-based DVDs. Naturally, any live performance music product is far more enjoyable as a multimedia surround presentation. With the CD portion of the industry in such serious flux, it’s critical that consumers are given strong value for their dollar. With DVD, you not only get the music in an interesting new environment, you can get interviews, photo montages, DV footage from the making of the music – really great stuff that truly personalizes and enhances the overall experience. I’d like to share some tech info about the origin and specs of the DVD format.

DVD Defined
Striking yet another death knell to the once eminent magnetic, media, DVD is a next generation robust optical-based media using similar laser reflection technology as the venerable compact disc. Originally dubbed the ‘Digital Video Disc’, the format’s ability to pack up to 17 GB of data onto a single double-sided disc has made it popular for data purposes in the computer world too, hence the updated nonmenclature ‘Digital Versatile Disc.’

To achieve this impressive increase in data density while retaining the same package dimensions as the CD, the DVD incorporates several improvements in the current CD spec. Like a CD, the DVD uses tiny pits arranged in tracks etched into substrate to modulate the reflection of a laser following along the track of pits into a pattern of digital 1s and 0s. The increased data density is achieved through these methods:

By reducing the length of the data pits from CD’s minimum size of 0.83 pm to 0.4 pm

By increasing the track density through the reduction of the intertrack space from 1.6 pm to 0.74 pm

By writing data to both sides of the disc, Multilayer technology, where data is written in the same lateral space.

CD and CD-ROM units use an infrared laser emission at a wavelength of 780 nm. DVD players/DVD-ROM drives use a laser with a red light emission at shorter wavelength of 650//635 nm. A shorter wavelength is better suited to reading the smaller, more densely packed pits as is the higher numerical aperture lens built into the laser assembly to narrow and more tightly focus the laser beam.

An increase in data density is useless if the storage media is unreliable. DVD’s error correction and digital modulation schemes have been enhanced to support the increase in data density over CD. The Reed Solomon (RS-PC) error correction system incorporated in DVD is 10 times more robust than the current CD system and the EFM Plus modulation scheme is both efficient and ensures backward compatibility.

Audio Advantages
Current DVD-V standards allow for a stereo linear PCM data stream that sonically exceeds the current compact disc standard. Indeed, DVD-A offers more than double the bandwidth of a standard CD with an increase in wordbit resolution to 24 bits. To conserve bandwidth for multiple language audio tracks and multi-channel formats like 5.1 surround, loss y data compression is used to reduce the overall audio file size while attempting to retain as much quality as possible. Although Dolby’s AC-3 compression technology is the current de facto standard, DTS is widely acknowledged as sonically superior for music product. Both choices easily surpass VHS’ best performance. The versatility to allow high quality multiple content/format audio is a huge step forward over VHS tape. The DVD format reserves tracks for a multitude of language tracks, greatly simplifying the international proliferation of a DVD product.

Viewing Quality
Lines of resolution are the key factor here. The venerable VHS format allows for a meager scanning resolution of 210 lines at its SP setting. Raising the bar substantially, DVD allows for a scanning resolution of 540 lines – a 257% increase in video quality. In addition, widescreen, letterbox or panned formats are easily accommodated.

Investment Protection
Content Scrambling System (CSS) is an encryption method optionally built into DVDs to restrict access to the product in certain situations – like unauthorized copying/duplicating or the export of the product to an unintended geographical region. Regional coding was implemented to better control the product flow and protects a film company’s investment in new film product. Regions of distribution in the DVD coding are as follows:

Region 1 – USA, Canada
Region 2 – Europe, Japan
Region 3 – India, Pakistan, Asian Pacific
Region 4 – Latin America, Australia, New Zealand
Region 5 – Africa, Russia, Eastern Europe
Region 6 – China, Hong Kong

Fortunately, the DVD format has yet to encounter the industry destructive ‘set-and-forget’ copy vehicles omnipresent in the troubled CD world. Coupled with CSS, the hefty file size of encoded, compressed audio and video makes proliferation somewhat impractical over the Internet, without recompressing the material further and substantially degrading the copy quality. Internet service providers generally bill a surcharge once a client’s download quantity exceeds 5 GB/month – the data contained in a single-sided, single layered DVD – so a casual data pirate can expect substantial data overage charges for transmitting a number of DVDs, after the hardware is purchased and the CSS is cracked sans artifacts. In comparison, a CD is unprotected, uncompressed, and converted to MP3 format amounts to roughly 45 MB of data. More than 100 CDs can be transmitted via the Internet per month without ISP intervention.

In The End, Who Wins?

According to the International Recording Media Association, DVD players are already in over 37 million US homes. It’s the fastest-growing consumer electronics product in history.

They’re robust, they’re versatile, they’re inconvenient to pirate and they’re here to stay. With an advantage for almost everyone, the development of new DVD product as well as the reissuing of catalog material in this ubiquitous format is a most wise production investment.

original link: www.professional-sound.com